Beauty salon in Kurgan paid 230 thousand former employee

Kurgan bailiffs obtained the execution of the court decision in favor of the former hairdresser of one of the city beauty salons. According to the press service of the FSSP of Russia in the Kurgan region, the employer paid the woman about 230 thousand rubles – this amount included compensation for unused vacation, interest for delay in payment and compensation for moral damage. In addition, the salon entered into the employee’s workbook records of employment and dismissal.

The conflict arose after the dismissal of the woman: she claimed violation of her labor rights. According to the former employee, she was not allowed to walk off the statutory leave and did not pay the appropriate compensation. In addition, the employer did not draw up the necessary entries in the employment record book - this could have a negative impact on the total work experience, and in the future - on the amount of pension and other social benefits.

The court established the fact of labor relations and agreed with the plaintiff's arguments. By the decision of the court, the employer was obliged not only to pay money, but also to issue documents properly.

The executive document was received by the Kurgan city department of bailiffs. Employees of the service initiated enforcement proceedings and established a five-day period for voluntary execution of the decision. The salon was explained that in case of delay, he will have to pay an additional executive fee - for a legal entity, its amount exceeds 100 thousand rubles. The fee does not exempt from the obligation to pay the due compensation.

The management of the salon decided to fulfill the requirements of the court as soon as possible. The funds were transferred to the former employee, the necessary entries were made in the employment record book. Execution proceedings are completed in connection with the actual fulfillment of the requirements.

Earlier, “MK-Ural” wrote that the head and chief accountant of the Kurgan organization (in one person) was brought to justice for failure to comply with the requirements of bailiffs on the transfer of alimony payments. The father for a long time evaded the payment of alimony for the maintenance of his son. Despite the fact that the child is 18 years old, the obligation to repay the maintenance arrears for the parent remained.