The court sentenced Kirov citizen for false orders of the mayor’s office

The man was found guilty of committing a crime under Part 3 of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for using a knowingly forged official document giving certain rights.

The state prosecution at the trial was supported by employees of the district prosecutor's office.

The reason for initiating a criminal case was the materials of the supervisory authority. The prosecutor’s office opened the violation during the inspection of compliance with the requirements of the legislation in the field of disposal of the municipal housing fund.

The evidence collected was transferred to the investigating authorities for further investigation.

During the judicial investigation it turned out that in July 2025, the defendant appealed to the office of the MFC. There he presented a fake order of the head of the municipal property department of the city administration.

According to this document, the living room in the house No. 6 on Volodarsky Street was officially transferred to the status of a non-residential object.

In fact, the defendant in the case tried to legitimize the already actually completed redevelopment. Construction work was completed in the premises, and a separate entrance group for commercial use appeared on the facade of the residential building.

The fact of unauthorized conversion of areas without permits was recorded by employees of the management company serving the house, and then confirmed by the prosecutor's inspection.

Such actions created potential risks for the construction of the apartment building and violated the rights of other residents, since any interference with the load-bearing walls and facade requires strict compliance with established procedures and coordination with the city authorities.

The court shared the position of the state prosecutor and found the man guilty. Taking into account the nature and degree of public danger of the crime, as well as information about the identity of the defendant, the court appointed him 9 months of restriction of liberty.

By the decision of the judge, the seized false administrative document will be stored in the materials of the criminal case as material evidence throughout the period established by law.