Missed for six years. The court deprived the parental rights of a Minsk citizen in respect of a nine-year-old daughter
The court, with the participation of the prosecutor, considered a civil case on the claim of a Minsk woman about the deprivation of parental rights of the father of her daughter.
The court with the participation of the prosecutor considered a civil case on the claim of a Minsk woman about the deprivation of parental rights of the father of her daughter, the correspondent of the Minsk-Novosti agency reports.
The photo is illustrative in nature
With a claim for deprivation of parental rights of the father of a 9-year-old daughter, a Minsk woman appealed to the court. The woman indicated that she was not married to the defendant, his paternity was established on the basis of a court decision. Subsequently, alimony was collected from the man because he did not voluntarily help to support the child. By the way, their defendant pays in the minimum amount, as unemployed.
In court, the Minsk woman said that the father of the child stopped communicating with her during pregnancy. He first saw his daughter when a woman filed a lawsuit to establish paternity, and then disappeared for six years. The unlucky parent appeared in May 2023 and asked to sign documents that he allegedly fulfilled all alimony obligations to his daughter until her adulthood (it was necessary to move to another country). However, the plaintiff refused, after which the man again disappeared from their lives.
- In December 2024, the citizen already appealed to the court with a claim to deprive the father of parental rights, but he was categorically against, referring to conflicting relations with the mother of the child, said Tatiana Litvinchuk, senior assistant prosecutor of the Soviet region. The court then refused to satisfy the claims, warning the father about changing his attitude to the upbringing of his daughter.
However, in the future, nothing has changed – the man did not take any measures to establish contact with the child. However, he was still against the deprivation of his parental rights.
In court, the goddaughter and the mother-in-law of the plaintiff explained that they had never seen the father of the child. They also noted that the current husband of the mother raises her girl from birth and wants to adopt. The conducted diagnostic examination confirmed their words: the schoolgirl has no attachment to the biological father, she does not seek to communicate with him - the girl considers the father to be a stepfather with whom she has a trusting relationship.
“The court, having heard the positions of the parties, the conclusion of the district department for education and having studied the written materials of the case, agreed with the position of the prosecutor and decided to deprive the defendant of parental rights,” Litvinchuk continued. The court decision has not entered into legal force.
