In Kalmykia appointed an additional punishment to the competition manager
By the verdict of the Lagansky district court, K. was found guilty of embezzling the property of JSC “Djalykovo” of the Lagansky district entrusted to him.

By the verdict of the Lagansky district court, K. was found guilty of embezzling the property of JSC “Djalykovo” of the Lagansky district entrusted to him. It is reported that he did this using his official position, on an especially large scale, twice withdrawing 4 million 968 thousand rubles from the account of the society.
K. was sentenced under Part 4 of Article 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation to punishment in the form of imprisonment for a term of two years with serving in a general regime correctional colony.
Having studied the arguments of the appeal submission of the district prosecutor and the appeals of the convicted person, his defense counsel, the judicial board changed the court verdict.
By the decision of the Arbitration Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan of August 20, 2021, JSC Djalykovo was declared insolvent (bankrupt), with the opening of competitive proceedings, and K. was approved by the bankruptcy manager.
On October 14, K., as a customer, concluded contracts for the provision of services for the storage and maintenance of animals owned by JSC Djalykovo, which were pledged to JSC Rosselkhozbank under a loan agreement, with former employees of JSC Djalykovo as executors with their subsequent redemption as a security payment.
After the transfer of funds to the account of JSC "Dzhalikovo" between them and K. as an arbitration manager, sales contracts were signed.
After that, K. issued fictitious contracts for the assignment of claims (cession) dated December 14, 2021 between his friend P. and livestock breeders who bought the animals pledged from the bank, and then transferred the money to the account opened on P., allegedly with the appointment of payment “reimbursement of expenses for the storage of property encumbered by a pledge, return of a security payment under a storage contract and an assignment agreement of claims.” Afterwards, as a trustee, he wrote them off and ordered them at his discretion.
As established by the court of first instance, criminal acts committed by K. in the implementation of the activities of the arbitration manager using his position, – stated in the official message.
The board appointed K. an additional punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to engage in the professional activities of the arbitration manager for three years.



